Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Recently while the local C.N.N. Version of the news, an error was noticed. The title of an aircraft carrier. For those that did not know alias hurricane Irene could not have created emergency response by the United Navy Carrier U.S.S. Wasp!
For civilian personnel, the U.S.S. Wasp was a distinguished combat vessel serving duty in the Pacific ocean. As a result of battle damage during action against the Japanese, Wasp sank with a loss of several hundred crewman. Prior to this catastrophe, Wasp was responsible for the rescue of crewman from the combat group sister ship. The actual release of this information was withheld several months from the civilian public coincidentally.
I am tempted beyond the creation of a small “They did what article” to demand retraction from the station in question. Misinformation even in small items such as this creates distrust within the media. As quoting one civilian witness, “Do they think we are all stupid?”
Still serving with the United States Navy is the U.S.S. Lexington II. Named so after the original vessel was also sank in similar action against the opponent. This carrier operates as a training vessel for new aviators and midshipmen transitioning to commissioned officer status.
In related new quips:
Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Heated battles continue over the information supper highway, craving for advanced knowledge has created a backlog of work. Demands for prioritization of request is now in full effect. Without proper request and clearance form many inquiries are will be ignored despite of harassment or intimidation efforts.
While public service utilities are utilized for some forms of communication the pilferage and abuse of the input users runs rampant. Theft of paperwork under the constitutional amendment is an act of crime and violation of civil rights. (As is violation of attorney client privilege)
Amendment 13
1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime
whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United
States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate
legislation.
Amendment 4
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and
effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and
no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or
affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the
persons or things to be seized.
Amendment V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Amendment 5
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime,
unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising
in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time
of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense
to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any
criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life,
liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be
taken for public use, without just compensation.
While the quotation of such law is immediately disputed, the concepts of utterance demand the proper adherence in simplest forms. Recently in a war of words with alleged police personnel, one made the following remark. “I just love visiting this guy and seeing what he has to say”. My response was to remind this officer I was not required under law to make statements or consent to an interview with the presence of credible attorney at law being present. I further admonished them that seeking to obtain recordings of my vocalized speech dissertation for the purpose of creative writing and testing of phonetic speech patterns violated constitutional rights.
In response, the officer stated “I can stop and question you at any time I deem appropriate, and no I do not have to allow your attorney to be present. He further stated I can place you upon administrative hold for reasons of “walk thru booking” or observation without permitting your attorney to be notified. That is how I do my job”. I replied then we need new policemen.
Message interception is a prevalent issue with all forms of person demanding to be acclaimed and bluster personal importance. The issue is becoming a major issue clogging the dispatch circuit. Demands for the unqualified to intercept and present opinions upon private issue of discussion.
I remind all of you that under the heading of Amendment IX the wording is quite clear. Your rights to freedom of speech and action cease to be legal when they violate the freedoms and rights of another person. Furthermore the repeating of of valid case information is not slander, nor is it unlawful to discuss real news stories regardless of origin. Amendment I
Amendment VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.
In some areas blackmail “extortion” attacks are occurring. Demands for silence and quiet release of criminal complaints occur with daily. I’ve seen veteran police personnel squelch reports for the reasons of keeping quiet misconduct. When confronted they deny all allegations and further harass the victims. Even in times of war certain forms of conduct are deemed unacceptable.
Such an example is the tampering with of this document and unauthorized release by any person other than myself or representative legal council. It is an act of blatant harassment and bigotry to even claim parody upon classified “pres-manuscript” items of any copyrighted author. (Petty theft also)
I remind all of you any allegations made require under law redirection for the presentation of evidence within the confines of civil and or criminal court. Many a time I have challenged you. Meet me there without tampering the the theft of materials.
Anyway, that is the law as known to me in layman’s terms. Below are the public versions.
Computer printouts used as evidence, when.
569.094. In a prosecution under sections 569.095 to 569.099, computer printouts shall be competent evidence of any computer software, program, or data contained in or taken from a computer, computer system, or computer network.
(L. 1987 H.B. 208 § 2)
Tampering with computer equipment, penalties.
569.097. 1. A person commits the crime of tampering with computer equipment if he knowingly and without authorization or without reasonable grounds to believe that he has such authorization:
(1) Modifies, destroys, damages, or takes equipment or data storage devices used or intended to be used in a computer, computer system, or computer network; or
(2) Modifies, destroys, damages, or takes any computer, computer system, or computer network.
2. Tampering with computer equipment is a class A misdemeanor, unless:
(1) The offense is committed for the purpose of executing any scheme or artifice to defraud or obtain any property, the value of which is five hundred dollars or more, in which case it is a class D felony; or
(2) The damage to such computer equipment or to the computer, computer system, or computer network is five hundred dollars or more but less than one thousand dollars, in which case it is a class D felony; or
(3) The damage to such computer equipment or to the computer, computer system, or computer network is one thousand dollars or greater, in which case it is a class C felony.
(L. 1982 H.B. 1454, et al. § 3, A.L. 1987 H.B. 208, A.L. 2002 H.B. 1888)
CROSS REFERENCES:
Civil action for tampering with computer equipment, expenses and attorney fees, RSMo 537.525
Definitions for criminal statutes for computer crimes unless context requires a different definition, RSMo 556.063
Tampering with computer users, penalties.
569.099. 1. A person commits the crime of tampering with computer users if he knowingly and without authorization or without reasonable grounds to believe that he has such authorization:
(1) Accesses or causes to be accessed any computer, computer system, or computer network; or
(2) Denies or causes the denial of computer system services to an authorized user of such computer system services, which, in whole or in part, is owned by, under contract to, or operated for, or on behalf of, or in conjunction with another.
2. The offense of tampering with computer users is a class A misdemeanor unless the offense is committed for the purpose of devising or executing any scheme or artifice to defraud or to obtain any property, the value of which is five hundred dollars or more, in which case tampering with computer users is a class D felony.
(L. 1982 H.B. 1454, et al. § 4, A.L. 1987 H.B. 208, A.L. 2002 H.B. 1888)
CROSS REFERENCES:
Civil action for tampering with computer users, expenses and attorney fees, RSMo 537.525
Definitions for criminal statutes for computer crimes unless context requires a different definition, RSMo 556.063
Tampering with computer data, penalties.
569.095. 1. A person commits the crime of tampering with computer data if he knowingly and without authorization or without reasonable grounds to believe that he has such authorization:
(1) Modifies or destroys data or programs residing or existing internal to a computer, computer system, or computer network; or
(2) Modifies or destroys data or programs or supporting documentation residing or existing external to a computer, computer system, or computer network; or
(3) Discloses or takes data, programs, or supporting documentation, residing or existing internal or external to a computer, computer system, or computer network; or
(4) Discloses or takes a password, identifying code, personal identification number, or other confidential information about a computer system or network that is intended to or does control access to the computer system or network;
(5) Accesses a computer, a computer system, or a computer network, and intentionally examines information about another person;
(6) Receives, retains, uses, or discloses any data he knows or believes was obtained in violation of this subsection.
2. Tampering with computer data is a class A misdemeanor, unless the offense is committed for the purpose of devising or executing any scheme or artifice to defraud or to obtain any property, the value of which is five hundred dollars or more, in which case tampering with computer data is a class D felony.
(L. 1982 H.B. 1454, et al. § 2, A.L. 1987 H.B. 208, A.L. 2002 H.B. 1888)
CROSS REFERENCES:
Civil action for tampering with computer data, expenses, attorney fees, RSMo 537.525
Definitions for criminal statutes for computer crimes unless context requires a different definition, RSMo 556.063
See http://www.moga.mo.gov/statutesearch/Default.aspx”>Revised Statutes Of Missouri
Initial Notices of Digital Transmissions of Sound Recordings
The following services have filed Initial Notices of Digital Transmissions of Sound Recordings under Statutory License pursuant to
section 201.35 of title 37, Code of Federal Regulations, between November 12, 2001 and April 9, 2004. Please note that the notice
and recordkeeping regulations located in sections 201.35-201.37 have been moved to a new part 270, effective April 12, 2004.
Copies of Initial Notices filed are available in the Licensing Division Public Records Office, or you may contact the Licensing
Division. See Circular 75 for more information. (181. Primal Image Entertainment, Inc. 182. PrivateJazz.com 183. Rabid Radio
184. Radio 1190 Online 185. Radio Africana, LLC 186. Radio Free Hamptons {exert})
Sgt. Major
/ day
Zortrium Armor
Standard Shield Generator
Fusion Drive (100%)
: 5)
Fuel Scoop (100%)
Bussard Ramscoop (100%)
Auto Refueler (100%)
Escape Pod (100%)
Magnetic Scoop (100%) - 
Ambush Teleporter (100%)
ECM Jammer (100%)
Class I Teleporter (100%)
Software Upgrade - Map Pack II
Software Upgrade - Bounty Link II
