Hurst Tool Certified! Auto & Farm Extrication Specialist! (University Of Columbia Fire Sciences)
I began as volunteer Fireman after serving in the U.S. Navy. I was a crewman aboard the U.S.S. Dwight D. Eisenhower CVN-69. I was assigned to VS-31 (see below). Originally I was a rated as an Aviation Maint Administration Man. Very boring, and requested a transfer. My calling of duty was Classified Damage Control Petty Officer for the Unit. (see the modernized logo below). All departments were located County of Greene, State of Missouri. The first department I served was the County Wide Fire & Rescue (Which Later Became Station #2 of the Battlefield Fire Protection District (Evans Road - Southwest Power Plant)
During the same time period I also worked part time with the Greene County Office of Emergency Management. While working with the Pleasent View Fire Protection District I suffered a broken leg. (Mechanical Failure on what was then truck #605).
The Ebaneezer Fire Protection District was my last working Fire & Rescue service position. (Link Repaired)
For most security products that I hadn't ordered via my own company Dragon Specialty Products©, I used the sources provided by Gall's Inc.
Many of you remember the Edge 9000? ">
Courtesy of the folks at Whelen I bring a reprise of the system on my truck.
I borrowed this LP photo from the folks at Code 3 Products the reason was I simply didn't have my photo kit with me. This configuration is the style my car was equiped with. We called it the Highway Patrol Edition. below you will also find the a photo of the V-con Siren unit.
I also wore the Point Blank threat Level IIIA vest on the job. It replaced my older Second Chance body armor. Several years later I still get cold easy. (While not certified as of yet, I am classified by many as a true survivor!)

So let us start with what I call a red bull event. Service awards and the real U.S. Military record. And spare me th edition of Michelle Pffifier times even in jest that is a sore spot. (A blask and white photocopy of fantasy land Navy doesn't hold water here as they say in the hill country) This item is called the National Defense Ribbon.
Where any of you aware Depending upon the regulations revision utilized I am entitled under the Uniform Code Of Military Justice and Naval regulations to wear this award for service to the United States? (That is a simple I was in the military during the time of award)
Now about that DD214 that you folks do not want displayed. Why? Because the real one contains the relevant facts and that eqautes over to a simple many of you lied.
Life is not a video game. So when one of the guys I know claimed he had earned a Silver Star, I nearly took his proverbial head off. I take these matters very seriously. Next arguement was that I have 2, count them: Two very real sets of discharge papers, not counting your white out versions popularized by Doug, Daryl, Timmy and the listed offenders in the listed court case.
Next issue was these little guys. They are from the U.S. Navy.

These are the Marksmanship with a pistol and rifle ribbons. And would you look at the publicly presented series of photos? Including the ones from personal pictures and the official U.S. Navy publications? Were any of you aware that I was wearing these after having earned them at Great Lakes naval Training Center? And that upon my arrival for training upon Meridian Air Station they were again validated? So why does not your "reports" reflect that fact? Perhaps the documented evidense of say Group Graduation Photos is not acceptable to your movie land belief? I suppose teh information provided by the Judge Advocate Generals office is not accpetable in the real world according to your select few?
I was still wearing these comendations upon reporting the Jacksonville Naval Air Station & Cecil Field. Again validated. In addition to those service awards I also wore the following:
Wow look I can prop up you paper and chew it like a good little wasp. At this point I would like to insert a direct qoute from the United States Department of the Navy. Now again, I ask you. Does the record reflect my job classification? And is this the listed job classification? Quick, get out the ink well and slander it for proper rebutals........
NEC Codes - DC 4805 Shipboard (CBR D) Operations and Training Specialist Conducts training for Shipboard Chemical, Biological and Radiological-Defense. Advises command on how to integrate into the normal command organization the functions necessary to prepare for, defend against, and recover from Shipboard Chemical, Biological or Radiological involvement. Supervises/performs shipboard organizational level maintenance on CBR D equipment. Conducts formal classroom training in Shipboard CBR D courses at Training Centers and Training Groups.
Qualification Data:
Now we have established I have a moderate point of credibilty. Let us continue! I am not asking your opinions, I am telling you the way teh *Real* Department of the Navy listed it. White it out again....
Have you seen this one?
Active Duty Sea Service. x2
So you look at this ok, cool you went to sea? Now I am going to offend a few veterans with due cause. One of my opposition members is a supposed big shot grunt with a tour in Viet Nam. And this dude has a real attitude problem if you get my drift.
Navy Expeditionary Medal X2
Now again I will quote The United States Navy:
Eligibility Requirements. Awarded to U.S. Navy service members who have actually landed on foreign territory and engaged in operations against armed opposition, or operated under circumstances deemed to merit special recognition and for which no service or campaign medal was awarded.
Only personnel who were attached to one of the ships/units listed in the notice/instruction at some time during the respective periods shown, and who actually participated in the given operation, are eligible for the Navy Expeditionary Medal. This includes personnel attached to a squadron or unit embarked in a ship during the eligible period for that ship. Members of rear echelons, transients, observers and personnel assigned for short periods of Temporary Additional Duty (TAD) or Training Duty (TD) are not normally eligible for the award. However, consideration will be given in those instances when the local commander certifies a particular and significant contribution by an individual. Such certification should be submitted to the CNO/CMC via the fleet commander who exercised operational control in the area involved. CNO maintains a list of eligible ships/units.
The following are recently authorized expeditions:
- CUBA 03 Jan 61 - 23 Oct 62
- THAILAND 16 May 62 - 10 Aug 62
- INDIAN OCEAN/IRAN/YEMEN 08 Dec 78 - 06 Jun 79
- IRAN/INDIAN OCEAN 21 Nov 79 - 20 Oct 81
- LEBANON 20 Aug 82 - 31 May 83
- LIBYA 20 Jan 86 - 27 Jun 86
- PERSIAN GULF 01 Feb 87 - 23 Jul 87
- LIBYA (Operation SHARP EDGE) 05 Aug 90 - 21 Feb 91
- DISTANT RUNNER (Rowanda) 07 Apr 94 - 18 Apr 94
Commanding officers shall make appropriate service record entries for eligible enlisted personnel and issue letters of eligibility for eligible officer personnel. No citation or certificate will be issued.
Now you wish to argue further? See the dates of service listed? That means *TWO* according to the *real* United States Navy as just qouted. Go ahead, choose those selective wordings to power play your point. However before we go on. Can I ask all of you about the following:
Navy Unit Citation. X2
I'm making a point here ladies and gentlemen. You don not get the Expiditionary awards without this Citation also being awarded. They are a joint package. That also included the following award.
Navy Meritorious Unit Commendation X2
Such petty arguements? Again we have the classic arguement. I am going to end that arguement. I have THREE veterans I served with at my disposal and they brought the commendation books. And guess who's name is contained with them?
And last but not least:
Battle Efficiancy x2
The Battle Effectiveness Award (formerly the Battle Efficiency Award), commonly known as the Battle "E", is awarded annually to the small number of U.S. Navy ships, submarines, aviation, and other units that win their battle effectiveness competition.
The criterion for the Battle Efficiency Award is the overall readiness of the command to carry out its assigned wartime tasks, and is based on a year-long evaluation. The competition for the award is, and has always been, extremely keen. To win, a ship or unit must demonstrate the highest state of battle readiness.
The Battle Efficiency Award recognizes sustained superior performance in an operational environment within a command.[1] To qualify for Battle "E" consideration, a ship must win a minimum of three out of four Command Excellence awards (Maritime Warfare, Engineering/Survivability, Command and Control, Logistics Management), and be nominated by their immediate superior in command. Eligibility for the award demands day-to-day demonstrated excellence in addition to superior achievement during the certifications and qualifications conducted throughout the year. A ship’s performance during training exercises, weapons inspections, and tactical readiness examinations are among the 16 different areas that are considered in the competition
Ships that win a battle efficiency competition are authorized to paint a white "E" with black shadowing on their stacks or elsewhere to display evidence of the honor. For each subsequent consecutive competition won, the ship paints an angled line, or hashmark, below the white "E". The very rare winners of five consecutive "E"s replace the white "E" and hashmarks with a gold "E" and silver star just above. The "E" and any hashmarks are removed in the year the ship first fails to win the award.
Personnel of ships and units that win the Battle "E" are authorized to wear the Navy "E" Ribbon and Battle "E" Device. Before 1976, they wore a small cloth "E" on their uniform sleeves, with hashmarks and color corresponding to that on their ship or unit.
Would you believe I also earned the following:
Aviation Warfare Surface Warfare Specialist. I actually earned those complete with a reminder once again from the United States Navy.
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/navy/docs/esws.htm
The purpose of the Navy EAWS Study Guide is to help enlisted sailors become Warfare Specialist qualified. For some the EAWS pin will be required prior to taking the enlisted advancement exam.
Getting Started
The first step in qualifying for the EAWS program is to get command approval. Your supervisor will probably direct you to your command's coordinator or Career Counselor.
After you have been approved for the Enlisted Aviation Warfare Specialist program, you will be given the common core and Navy ship, unit or aircraft specific PQS books. The links on this page provide common core and some unit specific study guides needed for your Enlisted Warfare Specialist studies.
Next Step
The next step is to get signatures for both common core and Navy ship, unit or aircraft specific specialties. You may either attend the scheduled classes if there are any in your command, or get signatures from a qualifier individually. To obtain that signature, you must demonstrate knowledge - and will probably gain additional knowledge, for that particular area of study.
After getting all signatures, you will take the Enlisted Aviation Warfare Specialist test. The test consist of material referenced in your PQS guide. Next comes the EAWS board. You will demonstrate your knowledge to a panel of members who have been chosen to determine if you are an Enlisted Aviation Warfare Specialist!
Getting qualified as a Warfare Specialist is not easy. It's rewarding though and is an important career milestone. Remember, don't get signatures without studying first. You'll be wasting the Warfare Specialist qualifier's time and yours.
NEC 9517 3 M System Coordinator
Description:
Responsible for the coordination of all facets of maintenance and material management (3-M) systems. Must possess the ability to implement, evaluate, and coordinate the ship's planned maintenance systems (PMS). As the Maintenance Data Systems (MDS) manager, the 3-M coordinator must possess the ability to operate and effectively manage the MDS. The 3-M Systems Coordinator also serves as the ship's availability manager.
Qualification Data:
Notes:
1. This NEC also can be earned during initial SNAP II shipboard implementation by participation in NAVMASSO provided SNAP 3M System training. Submit recommendation on NAVPERS 1221/6 to PERS-4013D2. 2. Personnel awarded NEC 9517 must complete JQR and attend follow-on training.
Having notated all of this: I was short range nominated for:
The arguement again is the supposed presiding authorities:
ESTABLISHING AUTHORITY
The Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal was originally established as the Secretary of the Navy Commendation for Achievement with Ribbon by Secretary of the Navy John B. Connally's SECNAVINST 1650.12 of May 1, 1961. In 1962 the name was shortened to the Secretary of the Navy Commendation for Achievement. In 1964 it was converted to a medal and its name was changed to the Secretary of the Navy Commendation for Achievement Medal, and on July 17, 1967 the Secretary of the Navy changed its name to the Navy Achievement Medal. The final name change took place via ALNAV 084/94 when Secretary of the Navy John H. Dalton changed the name to The Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal
EFFECTIVE DATES
The Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal has been in effect (with modifications) since May 1, 1961.
CRITERIA
The Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal may be awarded to members of the Armed Forces in the grades of lieutenant commander (or major) and below. It is awarded for meritorious service or achievement in either combat or noncombat based on sustained performance or specific achievement of a superlative nature but which does not warrant a Navy Commendation Medal or higher. It may not be awarded for service involving participation in aerial flight after January 1, 1969.
And one final note:
I do believe that summarizes the arguements: Despite the listings and references arguements still exist. In one case they claimed self promotion and in teh other they claimed "penalties". Niether of which counts against the records shown. (even circumstantially)
My sources are valid, credible and if you call me liar, say that to represented President elect George W. Bush Senior. Who for the record was the awards presenter while still Vice President, and then again as the President.
Additionally, there were (I was told) letters of personal commendation from President Elect (as represented) Willaim Clinton. These were for participation in a service group capacity from 1988 to 1995. Pick and choose your flags carefully. For even with just one listing that was proven, it means I spoke correctly.
Thus ladies and gentlemen, This actually proves that I was not the one who lied. Thank you for "reading".... We may now all return to our "he did not" frames of mind.
Now the basics are in place. Earlier I refered to: (photo doesn't look like her) Gee, Hang on, let me find the "stunt double" clone.
Now the reason for this reference is a set of letters supposedly from the Department of The Navy. Under the signature of this "supposed" Naval officer. The validity of the signature or letter is not the question for we already know it was a pure fraud. The issue was the use of the upposed name and the purpose of creating such "problems" and for what reason.
As publicity stunts go I give this little retribute a criminal case number and await the opportunity to prosecute the suspects. In addition I still have the sand ant issue and the problems they are creating. Among the "stinging salt" in this wound was arriving in my home to find an object that quite litterly offended me personally and to the point of reports to not only the real United States Secret Service, The Department of Defense and The Secratary of the Navy.
Now this medal I found after the burglary. It was dark blue and had three stars upon it.... I was looking at the "uniform" medal list and more oriented toward "Hollywood" presentations is the perception.I am not in the mood for those kind of games. Were I into video games senarios and pure crap, I might in "game character" say that I had earned some trinket like this. Perhaps you could airbrush another for me?
My point being:
I am missing a real U.S. Passport, Voters Registration Card, Copy of Birth Certificate and Associated School Records from civilain and government sources. And all the above is true. Now for the final entry of this page. Unless I make "concessions" to the equal of a bastard and liar (my opinion) They publicly claim I am only entitled to the following under thier derived version of white out and dd214 alterations.
This is your version of life.
And you did forget something (less the pencil alterations:)
So again I repeat, you movie wannabes are really getting on my nerves!
Daryl your still a fraud and a liar. Your also a on record as the offender I claimed you were!I don't care who's strings you pull. Anyone wanting the associated case numbers can contact me at any time. I will provide them for you provided you have the proper paperwork.


http://usmilitary.about.com/od/navynecs/p/DC4805.htm
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/navy/docs/esws.htm
http://usmilitary.about.com/od/navynecs/p/9517.htm
http://usmilitary.about.com/library/milinfo/navawards/blnavyexpeditionary.htm
Small Collection Of Generic Navy photos